Population Distribution

Population distribution by place type for Luxembourg. Dots show individual tagged places, with the maximum, minimum, and median population values highlighted.

Population distribution plot for Luxembourg
Upgrade Candidates

Places whose population is more consistent with the next-higher type's distribution than their own. Ranked by signal strength, then percentile within current type.

# Name Type Population Own %ile %ile among next higher Signal Edit OSM
1 Bertrange village 8,432 100% 60% Strong node/276120172
2 Belvaux village 7,615 100% 53% Strong node/266012269
3 Mamer village 7,513 99% 53% Strong node/108353083
4 Niederkorn village 7,350 99% 53% Strong node/466169828
5 Rodange village 7,302 99% 53% Strong node/266201601
6 Soleuvre village 6,162 99% 47% Strong node/266200751
7 Steinfort village 6,000 98% 47% Strong node/266690162
8 Bascharage village 5,683 98% 47% Strong node/265721999
9 Howald village 5,626 98% 47% Strong node/69622002
10 Rumelange village 5,604 98% 40% Strong node/270558512
11 Kayl village 5,537 98% 40% Strong node/268012630
12 Mersch village 4,804 97% 27% Strong node/61753841
13 Oberkorn village 4,588 97% 27% Strong node/465612813
14 Bereldange village 4,444 97% 27% Strong node/3300221255
15 Mondorf-les-Bains village 4,203 97% 27% Strong node/247995541
16 Tétange village 3,969 96% 27% Strong node/270558572
17 Mondercange village 3,842 96% 27% Strong node/266212134
18 Sandweiler village 3,608 96% 20% Strong node/61101176
19 Junglinster village 3,512 96% 20% Strong node/73801208
20 Bissen village 3,225 96% 20% Strong node/266204157
21 Wasserbillig village 3,136 95% 20% Strong node/95782558
22 Bridel village 3,085 95% 20% Strong node/64802907
23 Helmsange village 2,947 95% 20% Strong node/295943063
24 Lamadelaine village 2,817 95% 20% Strong node/267741768
25 Sanem village 2,788 94% 20% Strong node/266014538
26 Hesperange village 2,781 94% 20% Strong node/325629808
27 Leudelange village 2,702 94% 20% Strong node/266681785
28 Fentange village 2,633 94% 20% Strong node/269127500
29 Strassen village 9,888 100% 73% Weak node/71644004
30 Beaufort village 2,580 94% 20% Weak node/306487193
31 Steinsel village 2,437 93% 20% Weak node/130933138
32 Lintgen village 2,401 93% 20% Weak node/258683049
33 Itzig village 2,377 93% 20% Weak node/69621992
34 Kehlen village 2,365 93% 20% Weak node/259411644
35 Mertzig village 2,293 92% 20% Weak node/268809151
36 Frisange village 2,259 92% 20% Weak node/269243288
37 Alzingen village 2,167 92% 20% Weak node/276033178
38 Rollingen village 2,126 92% 13% Weak node/412120465
39 Eischen village 2,069 92% 13% Weak node/266691257
40 Roodt-sur-Syre village 2,055 91% 13% Weak node/256680135
41 Schieren village 2,026 91% 13% Weak node/52942189
42 Colmar-Berg village 1,995 91% 13% Weak node/7215296711
43 Clemency village 1,979 91% 13% Weak node/266178028
44 Heisdorf village 1,867 90% 13% Weak node/267550150
45 Capellen village 1,795 90% 7% Weak node/275607660
46 Gonderange village 1,785 90% 7% Weak node/269168427
47 Hautcharage village 1,771 90% 7% Weak node/266689777
Downgrade Candidates

Places whose population is more consistent with the next-lower type's distribution than their own. Ranked by signal strength, then percentile within current type.

# Name Type Population Own %ile %ile among next lower Signal Edit OSM
1 Luxembourg city 122,273 0% 100% Weak node/52943358
2 Clervaux town 1,425 7% 85% Weak node/1583666963
Monitor

Places that are consistent with their current type's distribution but sit at an extreme percentile within it. No reclassification signal yet, but worth revisiting as more population data is tagged.

# Name Type Population Own %ile Edit OSM
1 Esch-sur-Alzette town 36,218 100% node/1628731564
2 Dudelange town 21,291 93% node/203133645